Licence terms
01What a buyer would be granted
A licence to use the delivered assets and their accompanying telemetry for training machine learning models. Scope, term and exclusivity are commercial terms settled per agreement, not fixed here.
02What we would warrant
That every asset was submitted by a supplier under a signed agreement granting us the right to license it for AI training; that the chain of title is documented per asset and auditable; and that assets containing identifiable people have been routed and masked according to the published rights tiers.
What we would not warrant is anything we cannot verify. A supplier who lies to us is a risk we can reduce with contract, screening and payment-based identity checks, and cannot eliminate. That is described honestly on the rights and compliance page rather than hidden in a warranty we could not stand behind.
03Indemnity
The question every serious buyer asks first, and the one that decides whether a licence is worth anything. The answer depends on the entity, its capitalisation and its errors-and-omissions cover — none of which are settled. It will be answered plainly here, with a number, rather than left to be discovered in a schedule.
04Audio
Audio is used to synchronise multi-camera sets, then discarded and never licensed. No third-party music can travel with the footage because no audio travels with the footage.
05Questions before then
If you are evaluating supply and need to know where this is going, ask — legal@rightscleared.com. Buyer input on the indemnity position is more useful now, before it is drafted, than after.